Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In der vorliegenden historischen Studie wird erstmals das in der Frühen Neuzeit allgegenwärtige Erziehungsideal der Frömmigkeit systematisch erschlossen und im Kontext von Theologie, Anthropologie und Affektenlehre verortet. Im Kontext der Affekttheorien gewinnt der Frömmigkeitsbegriff an Tiefe und wird für pädagogische Fragestellungen fruchtbar gemacht. Zugleich finden die Affekttheorien des 16. Jahrhunderts in der theologischer Anthropologie ihren legitimen Ort. Der Autor analysiert, auf welchen Grundlagen die Erziehung der Affekte im christlich-konfessionellen Kontext des 16. Jahrhunderts beruhte. Das Emanzipationspotential wird dabei ebenso sichtbar wie immanenter (Selbst-)Optimierungs- und Anpassungsdruck. Untersucht werden zwei der wichtigsten Protagonisten der Pädagogik des 16. Jahrhunderts: Erasmus von Rotterdam und Philipp Melanchthon. Damit wird zugleich die konfessionelle Ausdifferenzierung der Frömmigkeitspädagogik und der Affektregulierung in den Blick genommen. Hier fördert die Untersuchung entscheidende, in der jeweiligen Anthropologie begründete Unterschiede zu Tage. Die Arbeit erschließt die Grundlagen für eine Frömmigkeitsforschung aus pädagogischer Perspektive. Frömmigkeit erscheint dabei als ein vielschichtiger Begriff mit großem Potential zum Verständnis der Pädagogik des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts.

Erasmus von Rotterdam --- Philipp Melanchthon --- Erziehungsideal --- Frömmigkeit --- Affekt --- Erasmus, Desiderius, --- Melanchton, Philipp, --- Erasmus, Desiderius --- Erasmus Roterodamus, Desiderius --- Erasmus --- Érasme --- Desiderius Erasmus --- Erasm, Dezideriĭ --- Erasme, Désiré --- Erasmo, --- Erasmo, Desidério --- Erasmus, --- Ėrazm, --- Erazm, --- Roterodamus, Erasmus --- Rotterdamskiĭ, Ėrazm --- Rotterdamský, Erasmus Desiderius --- Desiderius Erasmus, --- Erasm, Dezideriĭ, --- Erasme, Désiré, --- Erasmo, Desidério, --- Roterodamus, Erasmus, --- Rotterdamskiĭ, Ėrazm, --- Rotterdamský, Erasmus Desiderius, --- Роттердамский, Эразм, --- Эразм, --- Ерасм, Дезидерий, --- אראסמוס, דסידריוס, --- Роттердамский, Эразм --- Ерасм, Дезидерий --- エラスムス, デシデリウス

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book offers the first comprehensive account and re-appraisal of the formative phase of what is often termed the 'Grotian tradition' in international relations theory: the view that sovereign states are not free to act at will, but are akin to members of a society, bound by its norms. It examines the period from the later fifteenth to the mid-seventeenth centuries, focusing on four thinkers: Erasmus, Vitoria, Gentili and Grotius himself, and is structured by the author's concept of international society. Erasmus' views on international relations have been entirely neglected, but underlying his work is a consistent image of international society. The theologian Francisco de Vitoria concerns himself with its normative principles, the lawyer Alberico Gentili - unexpectedly, the central figure in the narrative - with its extensive practical applications. Grotius, however, does not re-affirm the concept, but wavers at crucial points. This book suggests that the Grotian tradition is a misnomer.

International relations --- Philosophy. --- Erasmus, Desiderius, --- Vitoria, Francisco de, --- Gentili, Alberico, --- Grotius, Hugo, --- De Groot, Huig --- De Groot, Huigh --- Grotius, Hugo --- Groot, Hugo de, --- Grozio, Ugo, --- Grot︠s︡iĭ, Gugo, --- De Groot, Hugo, --- Grocio, Hugo, --- Gentilis, Albericus, --- Francisco de Vitoria, --- Victoria, Francisco de, --- Francisco, --- Franziscus, --- Franzisco, --- Franciscus, --- De Vitoria, Francisco, --- Vittoria, Francisco de, --- Erasmus --- Erasmus, Desiderius --- Érasme --- Desiderius Erasmus --- Erasm, Dezideriĭ --- Erasme, Désiré --- Erasmo, --- Erasmo, Desidério --- Erasmus, --- Ėrazm, --- Erazm, --- Roterodamus, Erasmus --- Rotterdamskiĭ, Ėrazm --- Rotterdamský, Erasmus Desiderius --- Роттердамский, Эразм --- Эразм, --- Ерасм, Дезидерий --- Erasmus Roterodamus, Desiderius --- エラスムス, デシデリウス --- Desiderius Erasmus, --- Erasm, Dezideriĭ, --- Erasme, Désiré, --- Erasmo, Desidério, --- Roterodamus, Erasmus, --- Rotterdamskiĭ, Ėrazm, --- Rotterdamský, Erasmus Desiderius, --- Роттердамский, Эразм, --- Ерасм, Дезидерий, --- אראסמוס, דסידריוס,

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Kirk Essary examines assumptions about the very nature of theology in the sixteenth century, how it was understood by leading humanist reformers, and how ideas about philosophy and rhetoric were received, appropriated, and shared in a complex intellectual and religious context.

Christian philosophy --- Theology --- Philosophy, Christian --- Philosophy --- History --- Erasmus, Desiderius, --- Erasmus --- Erasmus, Desiderius --- Érasme --- Desiderius Erasmus --- Erasm, Dezideriĭ --- Erasme, Désiré --- Erasmo, --- Erasmo, Desidério --- Erasmus, --- Ėrazm, --- Erazm, --- Roterodamus, Erasmus --- Rotterdamskiĭ, Ėrazm --- Rotterdamský, Erasmus Desiderius --- Роттердамский, Эразм --- Эразм, --- Ерасм, Дезидерий --- Criticism and interpretation. --- Influence. --- Erasmus Roterodamus, Desiderius --- Bible. --- Criticism, interpretation, etc. --- Critique, interprétation, etc. --- 1500-1599 --- Epistles of Paul --- Paul, Epistles of --- Paul Sŏsin --- Pauline epistles --- Risālat al-Qiddīs Būlus al-rasūl al-thāniyah ilá Tīmūthīʼūs --- エラスムス, デシデリウス --- Desiderius Erasmus, --- Erasm, Dezideriĭ, --- Erasme, Désiré, --- Erasmo, Desidério, --- Roterodamus, Erasmus, --- Rotterdamskiĭ, Ėrazm, --- Rotterdamský, Erasmus Desiderius, --- Роттердамский, Эразм, --- Ерасм, Дезидерий, --- אראסמוס, דסידריוס,